A Worthing nursing home was running resident internet over its office network, with thick walls cutting signal and complaints growing. We built a dedicated, fully isolated resident service from the ground up.
| Venue type | Nursing home (resident bedrooms plus communal areas, with a separate upstairs admin office) |
| Location | Goring-by-Sea, Worthing, West Sussex |
| Size | Approximately 55-bed capacity, multiple resident rooms and shared communal spaces across two levels |
| Peak demand | Steady demand across the day, with peaks in evenings and weekends as residents use iPads, phones and laptops |
| Services delivered | WiFi site survey, structured cabling, VLAN design and isolation, access point deployment, wireless handset and door entry integration, managed support |
| Timeline | Survey and installation completed; go-live date held in job file. Ongoing managed service since. |
| Support model | Managed WiFi and network support, including remote health monitoring, proactive alerts and planned patching |
| Key result | Reliable resident internet coverage across all bedrooms and communal areas, with the office network fully protected by VLAN isolation. Client describes the service as faultless. |
Related services
- Managed WiFi for hospitality and venues
- WiFi site surveys and design
- Business internet and network installs
- UniFi managed WiFi
- VLAN network segregation
1. What was the client’s problem?
The nursing home had a problem that is more common in care settings than most people realise: resident WiFi was not really a resident service at all. It was the upstairs office network, informally extended downstairs, doing a job it was never designed to do.
For a time that was manageable. It stopped being manageable as resident expectations rose, device use increased, and the building’s fabric worked against every attempt to push a reliable signal through floors and thick walls.
Symptoms
- Coverage in resident bedrooms was weak and inconsistent, with dead spots across the building.
- Thick walls and the floor and ceiling structure between levels caused significant signal loss.
- Residents could not reliably use iPads, phones or laptops from their rooms.
- The problem had been present for years, but became increasingly difficult to tolerate as resident demand grew.
Business impact
- Complaints increased as reliable internet access became a basic expectation, not a bonus.
- Visiting family found connectivity was poor when they came to see residents.
- The office network was at risk from unmanaged resident device usage sharing the same infrastructure.
What triggered the project: A clear decision by the nursing home to provide a proper, dedicated resident internet service, separated from the office network, and designed to work within the constraints of the building.
Client requirements
- A dedicated, controlled connection run from the upstairs office comms area down to the resident floors.
- A VLAN ensuring resident internet traffic has no access to or visibility of office systems.
- Structured cabling installed throughout the resident areas.
- Access points covering all bedrooms and communal spaces reliably.
- A stable, straightforward solution to support in a care environment.
Constraints
- Older building with thick walls and challenging internal structure causing significant WiFi attenuation.
- Long cable runs required to reach all wings and coverage zones.
- Care setting constraints: installation routes needed to be tidy and disruption kept to an absolute minimum.
2. What we carried out in the survey process
The survey mapped the building from the perspective of signal behaviour and practical cabling reality, not just floor plans, and identified the decisions that would determine whether the final result held up under real resident usage.
What we checked
- The upstairs office network: where the connection would originate, and how to extend it in a controlled way.
- Building layout, wall thickness, and the likely attenuation between rooms, wings and levels.
- Cable routes and containment options appropriate to a care setting.
- Access point placement options in bedrooms and communal areas, balancing coverage with the constraints of a lived-in environment.
- Switch placement to manage long cable runs without compromising performance.
- VLAN design: how to give residents internet access while keeping office systems completely separate.
- Additional WiFi-dependent device requirements: wireless handsets and a door entry trigger system.
What we found
The resident areas had never been designed with WiFi in mind. The upstairs office network could not penetrate reliably through the floor and thick wall construction between zones. There was no shortcut available. A proper wired backbone, running cables to the right locations throughout the building, was the prerequisite for consistent wireless coverage. Without it, even the best access points would have been compromised by the structure they were working against.
The additional device requirements, particularly the door entry trigger, meant the network design needed to accommodate non-resident systems from the outset rather than as an afterthought.
Risks and how we mitigated them
| Risk identified | How we mitigated it |
|---|---|
| Coverage gaps caused by thick walls and floor construction | Wired the backbone to place APs where signal was actually needed, rather than relying on coverage from a central point |
| Resident traffic affecting or reaching office systems | VLAN isolation designed in from day one, not added later |
| Cable run length and routing complexity in an older building | Planned containment routes carefully during survey; used intermediate switching where run lengths required it |
| Disruption to residents and staff during installation | Phased and tidy installation approach, working around care home routines |
3. The solution we provided
We built a fully dedicated resident WiFi service from scratch, routed from the upstairs office comms area under strict VLAN isolation, cabled throughout the building, and designed for the specific challenge of providing consistent coverage in an older property with thick walls.
Dedicated connection and VLAN isolation
We extended a controlled connection from the upstairs office comms area down to the resident floors. VLAN segmentation was configured so that resident devices have internet access and nothing else. The office network is invisible to anyone on the resident WiFi, and resident traffic cannot reach it. This protects the business from both a security and a performance perspective, and it is the right approach for any setting where two user groups share a building but must not share a network.
Structured cabling throughout
We installed structured cabling across the resident wings and communal areas, following routes appropriate to a care environment. This wired backbone is what makes the wireless layer reliable. Without it, access points end up placed where cables can reach rather than where coverage is needed. Every run was terminated and tested before access points were commissioned.
Access point deployment
Access points were installed to cover bedrooms and all communal spaces, with placement decisions based on survey findings rather than guesswork. The older building fabric required careful positioning to ensure signal reached the corners of rooms and the areas furthest from the nearest AP. Coverage was validated after installation and adjusted where needed.

Integration of additional WiFi-dependent systems
The new wireless platform was not just for resident internet access. We integrated a small number of wireless handsets and a door entry trigger system onto the same infrastructure, configured appropriately so these systems operate reliably alongside resident device usage without interfering with either.

Why this approach rather than alternatives: The temptation in this kind of project is to add access points and hope the signal improves. It rarely does in an older building with thick walls, because the bottleneck is the physical fabric, not the number of radios. Building the wired backbone first, running cables to the right locations and placing APs based on survey findings, is slower and more involved, but it is the only approach that produces a result that actually works and keeps on working.
Implementation
- Extended and configured the connection from the upstairs comms area, with VLAN isolation applied before any resident traffic flowed.
- Installed structured cabling across the building with appropriate containment throughout.
- Installed and commissioned access points across all resident zones.
- Integrated wireless handsets and door entry trigger onto the platform.
- Validated coverage across bedrooms and communal areas after commissioning.
- Provided staff with clear handover notes covering WiFi access and the support route.
4. The aftercare
The nursing home receives ongoing managed WiFi and network support as part of a wider IT relationship. Day-to-day monitoring and maintenance are handled remotely, with proactive intervention before issues affect residents or staff.
- Remote monitoring:Â Access points and core network devices are monitored continuously. Any offline device or degradation in performance triggers an alert, so problems can be identified and addressed without waiting for a resident complaint.
- Planned maintenance:Â Firmware updates and patching are scheduled to minimise disruption, with the rhythms of a care environment in mind. Changes happen at appropriate times, not during peak resident usage.
- Change support:Â Any changes, whether adding new systems, adjusting coverage or reconfiguring access, are submitted via the agreed support channel, logged and implemented under change control.
- Review cadence:Â Periodic reviews plus ad-hoc checks when resident demand increases or new WiFi-dependent systems are considered.
What comes next: Ongoing optimisation as resident usage grows, and future planning for additional WiFi-dependent systems if the home expands its technology offer.
Before and after
| Area | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Resident WiFi | Borrowed from upstairs office network | Dedicated, separately managed resident service |
| Network isolation | None: residents shared office infrastructure | Full VLAN isolation; office network unreachable from resident WiFi |
| Bedroom coverage | Weak and inconsistent; dead spots throughout | Consistent coverage across all bedrooms |
| Communal areas | Poor signal; thick walls limiting reach | APs placed to cover all shared spaces |
| Additional systems | Not catered for | Wireless handsets and door entry trigger integrated onto the platform |
| Office network risk | Exposed to unmanaged resident device traffic | Fully protected by VLAN separation |
| Ongoing management | Ad hoc | Remote monitoring, proactive alerts and planned patching |
Frequently asked questions
Can you provide WiFi through thick walls in older care buildings?
Why does a care home need a VLAN for resident WiFi?
Can WiFi-dependent systems like door entry and wireless handsets share the same network as residents?
How do you minimise disruption during installation in a care setting?
What ongoing support do care homes typically need for their WiFi?
Want the same outcome?
If your care home or nursing home is relying on an office network to serve residents, or if coverage is inconsistent and complaints are growing, a survey is the right place to start.
We work with care settings across West Sussex and the South East. We understand the constraints: older buildings, thick walls, tidy installation, and the importance of keeping disruption minimal in a lived-in environment.
Ideal for